Gary North's Y2K Links and Forums - Mirror

Summary and Comments

(feel free to mail this page)


Category: 

Too_Late

Date: 

1997-10-01 14:04:10

Subject: 

Half the Computer Divisions Won't Get Extra Money in '98 for Y2K

  Link:

http://cwlive.cw.com:8080/home/print9497.nsf/All/SL39mgm215DBA

Comment: 

If you don't pay to fix y2k, it won't be fixed. Almost half of polled managers of computer divisions say they don't expect to receive extra money in 1998.

A few say they won't need extra money. One cause for their optimism: they don';t have legacy systems. But the y2k problem is about legacy systems: old code. The non-legacy systems interact with legacy systems. The bad data will spread.

This appeared in COMPUTERWORLD (Sept. 22).

* * * * * * * *

To hear some analysts tell it, every IS manager under the sun should be ramping up his year 2000 repair effort now, if not yesterday.

But a Computerworld survey on budget trends for next year shows IS managers are split about whether they should take a bigger bite out of next year's budgets to take care of the year 2000 bug. Forty-eight percent of those surveyed said they expect year 2000 spending to rise next year, 46% expect it to stay flat and 6% predicted a drop. . . .

One reason some managers are confident is that their applications or hardware are relatively new, meaning they are more likely to be year 2000-compliant than older, mainframe-based Cobol systems.

Link: 

http://cwlive.cw.com:8080/home/print9497.nsf/All/SL39mgm215DBA

Return to Category: Too_Late

Return to Main Categories

Return to Home Page